I like Ira's names except I would like to maintain the current
"Set" sequence. I propose:
"New Printer and Job Admin Operations (Set 2)"
and
"New Device Admin Operations (Set 3)"
To be consistant, we should have also used the name:
"Job and Printer Set Operations (Set 4)"
But no need to make any retrofits.
Ron
"McDonald, Ira" wrote:
> Hi Tom,
> Hi Tom,
>> I favor just 'New Printer and Job Admin Operations, Set 2'
> and 'New Device Admin Operations, Set 1' (and suitably
> clear filenames for I-Ds).
>> Cheers,
> - Ira McDonald
> High North Inc
>> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hastings, Tom N [mailto:hastings at cp10.es.xerox.com]
> Sent: Monday, February 28, 2000 3:28 PM
> To: Ron Bergman; Tom Hastings; cmanros at cp10.es.xerox.com> Cc: ipp
> Subject: IPP> OPS - Need better titles for the Set2 and Set3 documents
>> Sounds like a problem we should fix in the titles of Set2 and Set3.
> However, Carl-Uno and I suggest that we should have some more description in
> the title too, such as:
>> Internet Printing Protocol: Additional Administrative Operations, Set 2
>> or:
>> Internet Printing Protocol: Additional Job and Printer Operations, Set 2
>> and:
>> Internet Printing Protocol: Device Operations, Set 3
>> (or should the latter be Set 1, since we haven't had any Device operation
> yet?)
>> For comparison, the current name for the Set operations is:
>> Internet Printing Protocol: Job and Printer Set Operations
>> Carl-Uno suggests we discuss this on the IPP telecon this Wednesday, and on
> the mailing list.
>> Comments?
>> Tom
>> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ron Bergman [mailto:rbergma at hitachi-hkis.com]
> Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2000 17:43
> To: Tom Hastings; cmanros at cp10.es.xerox.com> Subject: Set2 Operations
>> Tom,
>> This title is becoming extremely confusing. I suggest it be changed to:
>> Internet Printing Protocol: Additional Operations, Set 2
>> And a similar change for set 3.
>> These titles appear to be more descriptive. i.e. they are actually
> *additional* operations, not *set* operations.
>> Ron Bergman