Re: XP> [CSS3 Print] New feature proposal: 'fit' and 'fit-position'

From: don@lexmark.com
Date: Fri Sep 22 2006 - 07:40:41 EDT

  • Next message: don@lexmark.com: "XP> Fw: XHTML-Print Is a W3C Recommendation"

    Melinda:
     
    At this point in time, we have no opinion on this change.
     
    ***************************************************************************
     Don Wright don@lexmark.com
                                    f.wright@ieee.org / f.wright@computer.org
     Director of Standards
     Lexmark International INCITS Executive Board Vice-Chair
     C14/082-3 IEEE SA Standards Board Past Chair
     740 New Circle Rd IEEE SASB Patent Committee Chair
     Lexington, Ky 40550 Member: IEEE SA Board of Governors
     859-825-4808 (phone) Member: IEEE CS SAB & W3C AC
     603-963-8352 (fax) Director, IEEE-ISTO
    ***************************************************************************
     

    "Grant, Melinda" <melinda.grant@hp.com>
    Sent by: owner-xp@pwg.org
    09/13/2006 08:58 PM
     
            To: <xp@pwg.org>
            cc:
            Subject: XP> [CSS3 Print] New feature proposal: 'fit' and
    'fit-position'

    The CSS3 Box module contains two features that HP believes would be quite
    valuable for the CSS Print solution space, namely 'fit' and
    'fit-position'. See http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-box#fit for a description.
     
    These features would be a valuable addition to CSS Print, because they
    enable very easy positioning of images within boxes, something those of us
    who have worked on templates know requires lots of messy computation and
    numeric values with the currently required feature set.
     
    Adding new requirements to CSS Print will cause us to retreat from CR
    (Candidate Recommendation) status to LCWD (Last Call Working Draft) status
    for at least three weeks. Since CSS Print is waiting on CSS 2.1 to
    advance beyond CR, this short setback won't affect its completion
    schedule.
     
    Neither would this additional requirement affect current standards such as
    UPnP Print Enhanced or Bluetooth BPP. They both point to the current CR
    specification, and this of course won't change. However, new standards
    could point to a new CR version, thereby requiring additional feature
    support.
     
    Questions have been raised about whether multiple levels of conformance in
    the market would create interoperability problems. It would not, because
    the change is b/w compatible (nothing is being taken away), and support
    for the new standard(s) would indicate support for the new features.
     
    If you have objections to this proposed change, or wish to express
    support, please post your opinion here or to www-style@w3.org by September
    23.
     
    Best wishes,
     
    Melinda

      _____

    HP - Melinda Grant
    Connectivity Standards
    Consumer Printing and Imaging
    +1 (541) 582-3681
    melinda.grant@hp.com
      _____

     



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Sep 22 2006 - 07:40:49 EDT