That sounds like a good plan.
-Elliott
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-xp@pwg.org [mailto:owner-xp@pwg.org] On Behalf Of
> BIGELOW,JIM (HP-Boise,ex1)
> Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 3:14 PM
> To: xp@pwg.org
> Subject: XP> XHTML-Print becomes a W3C Candidate
> Recommendation, how long before it becomes a Proposed Recommendation?
>
>
> Hello,
>
> The W3C version of XHTML-Print [1] will be published as a
> Candidate Recommendation early in January.
>
> The W3C requires 2 interoperable implementations and a test
> suite to validate conformance.
>
> The question I tried to answer in today's HTML WG phone
> conference is how long to wait for 2 conforming
> implementations. The way the W3C works is the spec cannot
> become a Proposed Rec before the wait period elapses.
>
> I think it is better to shorten the transition period as much
> as feasible to give stability to the spec. But if it is too
> short, company's would not have time to implement and be
> comfortable announcing a product.
>
>
> The consensus was a minimum period of six months with the
> conformance test suite as soon as possible.
>
> Does anyone or any company care to comment on this?
>
> Jim
>
> --
> Jim Bigelow,
> Editor: XHTML-Print & CSS Print Profile
> W3C HTML and CSS Working Groups
> http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-print/
http://www.w3.org/TR/css-print/ Hewlett-Packard 208-396-2068
jim.bigelow@hp.com
[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-print/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jan 07 2004 - 16:23:13 EST