Dave,
You wrote:
>
> I don't think that we need to attempt to modify RFC3391,
> because that RFC attempt to be very general and evades the
> issue of what's in the headers for each message. Instead, I
> think that the usage of the Content-Disposition header should
> be documented in the xhtml-print specification itself.
>
> Then we register the new RFC2183 Content-Disposition
> parameter types. (The new registered types will appear at the
> following URL).
>
http://www.iana.org/assignments/mail-cont-disp
Thanks for the clarification!
Jim Bigelow
Hewlett-Packard
208-396-2068
jim.bigelow@hp.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jan 09 2003 - 16:41:40 EST