Fujisawa-san:
Just because the Presentation Module is not a part of XHTML Basic does not
mean we shouldn't support it. It seems to me it is perfectly valid to
chose the pieces of Modularization of XHTML that make sense. The
Presentation Modules provides additional text options that a low end client
might want to use without requiring that client to use CSS to achieve the
same effect. From the printer's perspective, these are all very simple to
implement so why not? XHTML Basic was the W3C's idea of a minimum set for
web browser and display on a monitor; that doesn't make it right for all
other environments.
*******************************************
Don Wright don@lexmark.com
Member, IEEE SA Standards Board
PatCom Chair, SCC Liaison
Member, IEEE-ISTO Board of Directors
f.wright@ieee.org / f.wright@computer.org
Director, Alliances and Standards
Lexmark International
740 New Circle Rd C14/082-3
Lexington, Ky 40550
859-825-4808 (phone) 603-963-8352 (fax)
*******************************************
Jun Fujisawa <fujisawa.jun@canon.co.jp>@pwg.org on 11/16/2002 11:50:49 AM
Sent by: owner-xp@pwg.org
To: PWG XHTML-Print <xp@pwg.org>
cc:
Subject: XP> Design rationale on presentation
I agree with the statement in Section 1.3.2 Presentation which
describe the design rationale on the presentation features of
XHTML-Print.
However, this design rationale does not seems to be consistent
with the fact that XHTML-Print includes Presentation Module
even if it is not part of XHTML Basic.
I would like to suggest to drop the support of Presentation Module
(or to add an explanation on why we need Presentation Module
along with CSS Print).
-- Jun Fujisawa <mailto:fujisawa.jun@canon.co.jp>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Nov 16 2002 - 18:03:36 EST