XP Mail Archive: XP> FW: What is the status of multiplexed/i

XP> FW: What is the status of multiplexed/interleaved?

From: Hastings, Tom N (hastings@cp10.es.xerox.com)
Date: Thu Jul 18 2002 - 11:41:41 EDT

  • Next message: don@lexmark.com: "XP> New W3C XHTML documents"

    Bob is making good progress in getting the multiplexed/interleaved publishes
    as an RFC.

    Tom

    -----Original Message-----
    From: Robert Herriot [mailto:bob@herriot.com]
    Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 22:28
    To: Hastings, Tom N
    Subject: Re: What is the status of multiplexed/interleaved?

    Ned said on June 21:

    "The changes you made seem fine; I've asked that the document be added to
    next week's IESG agenda."

    I await the IESG comments.

    Bob
    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "Hastings, Tom N" <hastings@cp10.es.xerox.com>
    To: "Herriot, Bob" <bob@herriot.com>
    Cc: "Hastings, Tom" <hastings@cp10.es.xerox.com>; "Lewis, Harry"
    <harryl@us.ibm.com>; "Zehler, Peter" <PZehler@crt.xerox.com>; "Wright, Don"
    <don@lexmark.com>
    Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 6:50 PM
    Subject: What is the status of multiplexed/interleaved?

    > Bob,
    >
    > You mentioned on the phone that Ned was sounding more like he would
    publish
    > multiplexed/interleaved as a RFC?
    >
    > Would it be Informational?
    >
    > What is its status and when do you think it will be published?
    >
    > At the PWG meeting last week, Peter signed me up to find out its status.
    >
    > The application/pwg-xhtml-print+xml document is still citing it in a
    > normative way. Also
    >
    > Thanks,
    > Tom
    >
    >



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jul 18 2002 - 11:43:57 EDT