UPD Mail Archive: RE: UPD> further input to font handling

RE: UPD> further input to font handling

From: Sandra Matts (sandram@boi.hp.com)
Date: Wed Feb 16 2000 - 16:01:46 EST

  • Next message: MATTS,SANDRA (HP-Boise,ex1): "FW: UPD> further input to font handling"

    user defined character sets are limited to 256 characters. It can
    be typical for Asian docs to contain 1000-2000 unique
    characters. Therefore the driver has to maintain a list of font
    descriptor numbers and when it downloads a character, it has
    to search for it in the list of font descriptors. It is not a major
    problem. There are drivers today that manage this. I just
    want to make sure that people realize there some work
    involved in the driver to make it work.

    Sandra Matts

    Sandra Matts
    Engineer Scientist
    Hewlett-Packard
    sandram@boi.hp.com
    208-396-4755 phone
    Boise, ID 83714

    -----Original Message-----
    From: owner-upd@pwg.org [mailto:owner-upd@pwg.org]On Behalf Of Norbert
    Schade
    Sent: Monday, February 14, 2000 2:04 PM
    To: UPD group
    Subject: UPD> further input to font handling

    Having checked user defined character sets in PCL over the week-end I think
    this is a good direction to go.
    I explained why a UPD has to have the ability to define and download user
    defined character sets in PostScript (only one character set per font, only
    few predefined char sets). So we would add few sections to the driver
    development to extend this functionality to PCL. We can use Unicode in PCL
    character set definitions.
    This would make UPDF practically independent from character sets for device
    fonts. It saves time when creating the UPDF font section. It makes the font
    description significantly shorter. It may even be more efficient in
    performance.
    I realize that it can happen that we redefine a character set, which was
    already a perfect match as a predefined, in certain cases.
    The only challenge would be to add the necessary functionality for PCL.
    A future switch to direct Unicode support in the PDL would then be little
    more than a finger snip.

    I still believe that we need the character set functionality described last
    Friday for dynamic character selection additionally, as some fonts may come
    with only "almost" perfect match from the font vendor, as some PDL may not
    offer a dynamic user defined character set.

    But for PCL 5, PCL 6 and PostScript this will make our life easier - and of
    those, who will write the UPDF.

    Norbert





    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Feb 17 2000 - 15:37:57 EST