Pete,
It is easy for me to say :-), but I believe that we *did* resolve this
issue, in favor of my proposal.
The following appeared on the IPP mailing list:
<dmc>
Maybe I'm not understanding. Can't you specify the "copies" attribute at
the Document level? Therefore, you could have a Job that was made up of
1
copy of Document 1, 3 copies of Document 2, and 1 copy of Document 3,
couldn't you? If you did, you might want to know if the 3 copies of Doc2
were collated or uncollated. I must be missing something--is there a
section that would straighten me out?
</dmc>
<th>
Now I see what you are suggesting. I suppose for consistency we could
have
a "collation-type" as a Document Template attribute. As long as it is
clear
that an implementation can implement the "job-collation-type" Job
Template
attribute without having to do the "collation-type" Document Template
attribute (and vice versa).
</th>
And I *thought* I remembered being on a call where Tom and Ira agreed with
the concept.
Anybody remember anything different?
Dennis
|---------+---------------------------->
| | "Zehler, Peter" |
| | <PZehler@crt.xero|
| | x.com> |
| | Sent by: |
| | owner-sm@pwg.org |
| | |
| | |
| | 07/01/03 11:14 AM|
| | |
|---------+---------------------------->
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| |
| To: "IPP Discussion List (IPP@pwg.org)" <IPP@pwg.org> |
| cc: "PWG Semantic Model WG (sm@pwg.org)" <sm@pwg.org> |
| Subject: SM> Remaining issue in Document object spec |
| |
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
All,
I did not capture the resolution (if any) on the following issue from
Dennis Carney.
ISSUE:
I definitely believe that we need a "Document-equivalent" of
job-collation-type. It would have different semantics, since the Job level
semantics include the concept of documents, but I believe that since it is
useful to know whether a Job is doing collated or uncollated copies, it
would also be useful to know the same for Documents.
Proposed resolutions:
<TH>I disagree. If we did add a Document attribute, it would need to have
the same value as at the Job Level, since you can't collate some documents
and not collate other documents in the same job. We don't duplicate on the
Document object other Job level attributes that apply to the job as a
whole, such as "job-name", "job-hold", "job-priority",
"job-finishing".</TH>
Before I put the updated document I would like to get consensus. Please
respond on the IPP list.
Opinions?
Pete
Peter Zehler
XEROX
Xerox Innovation Group
Email: PZehler@crt.xerox.com
Voice: (585) 265-8755
FAX: (585) 422-7961
US Mail: Peter Zehler
Xerox Corp.
800 Phillips Rd.
M/S 128-25E
Webster NY, 14580-9701
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jul 01 2003 - 17:38:06 EDT