Semantic Model Mail Archive: SM> document-id-uri semantics

SM> document-id-uri semantics

From: McDonald, Ira (imcdonald@sharplabs.com)
Date: Tue Mar 25 2003 - 12:18:24 EST

  • Next message: Hastings, Tom N: "RE: SM> document-id-uri semantics"

    Hi,

    The current "document-id-uri" in the IPP Document Object spec
    clearly that states that it is an opaque identifier, and cannot
    be used as the target of an operation (unlike the "job-uri" in
    RFC 2911). And it gives an example of an 'ipp:' schemed URI.

    I think I should write an Appendix to the Document Object that:

    (1) extends the IPP URL Scheme (adopted last month by the IETF
        for RFC publication as an IETF Proposed Standard) to apply
        to Document objects as well,
    (2) specifies the opaque identifier limitation,
    (3) is normatively referenced by the "document-id-uri" attribute
        definition in the main spec.

    As we discussed on the PSI telecon this morning, PSI doesn't
    care what the URL scheme is in the DocumentURI, just that it
    be unique within a print server.

    Comments?

    Cheers,
    - Ira McDonald, co-editor of IPP URL Scheme
      High North Inc



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Mar 25 2003 - 12:18:41 EST