Semantic Model Mail Archive: SM> RE: CreateJob REQUIRED now

SM> RE: CreateJob REQUIRED now

From: Hastings, Tom N (hastings@cp10.es.xerox.com)
Date: Thu Dec 05 2002 - 14:59:28 EST

Next message: Dennis Carney: "SM> ACT - IPP "-actual" attributes latest spec, version 0.2"

Previous message: Zehler, Peter: "SM> PWG Semantic Model Schema v0.90 available"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Dennis,

Good catch! Yes, the Document Object spec has to REQUIRE the Printer to
support the Create-Job operation, even though Create-Job is OPTIONAL in
[RFC2911] for a Printer to support.

I'll add this requirement to section 11.1 and to section 4.3.

Thanks,
Tom

-----Original Message-----
From: Dennis Carney [mailto:dcarney@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2002 11:00
To: hastings@cp10.es.xerox.com
Subject: CreateJob REQUIRED now

Tom,

The Document Object only makes sense if the Printer that implements it also
supports the CreateJob operation. However, CreateJob is optional in
RFC2911. So, does the Document Object spec need to make it clear that a
compliant implementation MUST implement CreateJob? Of course, it seems
obvious, but I guess I was surprised not to see any mention of this at all
in the spec.

Dennis

Next message: Dennis Carney: "SM> ACT - IPP "-actual" attributes latest spec, version 0.2"
Previous message: Zehler, Peter: "SM> PWG Semantic Model Schema v0.90 available"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Dec 05 2002 - 14:59:46 EST