All,
Does anyone have any objection to this change? I will add it to the agenda
for this week's telecon.
Pete
Peter Zehler
XEROX
Xerox Architecture Center
Email: PZehler@crt.xerox.com
Voice: (585) 265-8755
FAX: (585) 265-8871
US Mail: Peter Zehler
Xerox Corp.
800 Phillips Rd.
M/S 128-30E
Webster NY, 14580-9701
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hastings, Tom N
> Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 7:28 PM
> To: Zehler, Peter
> Cc: Hastings, Tom
> Subject: Suggestion for re-arranging the 2 State and Description
> tables
>
> Peter,
>
> I had a thought that would eliminate repeated attributes between:
>
> a. the Job State and Description Attributes Table and
> b. the Document State and Descriptions Attributes Table.
>
> At present there are a lot of duplicates between these two table. How
> about re-arranging these two tables into the following two tables instead:
>
> a. the Job and Document State Attributes Table and
> b. the Job and Document Description Attributes Table.
>
> Then indicate with each attribute, whether its J, D, or J,D for Job versus
> Document.
>
> It would also make these two table be consistent with
>
> c. the Job and Document Processing Table.
>
> and eliminate a lot of duplicate attributes, because a large number of
> attributes would have both J,D. And the description would just say
> "Job/Document".
>
> Also I never liked mixing State and Description attributes in the same
> table, since they are so fundamentally different.
>
> Thanks,
> Tom
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Sep 30 2002 - 07:45:53 EDT