From: Farrell, Lee (Lee.Farrell@cda.canon.com)
Date: Tue Jan 14 2003 - 15:06:44 EST
June 23 is better for me.
===========================
Lee Farrell
Canon Development Americas
110 Innovation Drive
Irvine, CA 92612
(949) 856-7163 - voice
(949) 856-7510 - fax
lee.farrell@cda.canon.com
===========================
-----Original Message-----
From: Harry Lewis [mailto:harryl@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 9:51 AM
To: pwg-announce@pwg.org
Subject: PWG-ANNOUNCE> June/July Meeting
It was pointed out in December that our current July (14-18 Vancouver, BC) schedule conflicts with an IETF meeting in Vienna. We don't have a great deal of IETF overlap, but we're attempting to avoid the conflict if possible. We tool a poll in December which slightly favored July 21 vs. June 16. During that poll, however, I received feedback that we should look at the week of June 23. I had originally thought that the end of this week was too close to the 4th of July.
I'll ask one more time - please vote - (no vote = don't care)
June 23-27
vs
July 21-25
I'll tally votes on Jan 16 and this topic will be put to rest at the plenary on Jan 21.
----------------------------------------------
Harry Lewis
IBM Printing Systems
----------------------------------------------
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Apr 16 2009 - 10:55:40 EDT