From: BERKEMA,ALAN C (HP-Roseville,ex1) (alan.berkema@hp.com)
Date: Mon Dec 02 2002 - 13:29:32 EST
I'll go along with Don's choices.
Alan
> -----Original Message-----
> From: don@lexmark.com [mailto:don@lexmark.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 5:54 AM
> To: Harry Lewis
> Cc: pwg-announce@pwg.org
> Subject: Re: PWG-ANNOUNCE> July conflict with IETF
>
>
>
> My choices, in order of preference:
>
> July 21
> Leave as is (July 14)
> June 16
>
> **********************************************
> Don Wright don@lexmark.com
>
> Member, IEEE SA Standards Board
> PatCom Chair, SCC Liaison
> Member, IEEE-ISTO Board of Directors
> f.wright@ieee.org / f.wright@computer.org
>
> Director, Alliances & Standards
> Lexmark International
> 740 New Circle Rd
> Lexington, Ky 40550
> 859-825-4808 (phone) 603-963-8352 (fax)
> **********************************************
>
>
>
>
>
> "Harry Lewis" <harryl@us.ibm.com>@pwg.org on 11/25/2002 11:14:01 PM
>
> Sent by: owner-pwg-announce@pwg.org
>
>
> To: pwg-announce@pwg.org
> cc:
> Subject: PWG-ANNOUNCE> July conflict with IETF
>
>
> It has been pointed out that our July 2003 meeting date (14-18) is the
> same week as the IETF meeting in Vienna.
>
> I would like to gauge the severity of this conflict to PWG members and
> preferences should a our schedule need to be modified. If you have an
> opinion please indicate
>
> 1. Prefer to keep current PWG July 14 -18 meeting date
> 2. Prefer to move PWG meeting to week of June 16
> 3. Prefer to move PWG meeting to week of July 21
>
> I do not feel any other dates are viable due to the proximity of USA
> Independence Day and the common practice of extending this
> holiday with
> vacation.
>
> No response will be considered a "don't care" NOT a "leave as is".
>
> Please respond by Thursday Dec 12.
>
> ----------------------------------------------
> Harry Lewis
> IBM Printing Systems
> ----------------------------------------------
> (See attached file: C.htm)
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Apr 16 2009 - 10:55:40 EDT