From: Harry Lewis (harryl@us.ibm.com)
Date: Fri Mar 02 2001 - 00:13:32 EST
I would resist any unnecessary prolonging of the X-HTML-Print process. I
would view the PWG working group as short lived. I think X-HTML-Print is a
good example of an industry wide standard, however, and feel the PWG is an
appropriate "owner" and "keeper" of this standard.
----------------------------------------------
Harry Lewis
IBM Printing Systems
----------------------------------------------
"ALBRIGHT,SHIVAUN (HP-Roseville,ex1)" <shivaun_albright@hp.com>
Sent by: owner-pwg-announce@pwg.org
03/01/2001 06:10 PM
To: "'ElliottBradshaw@oaktech.com'" <ElliottBradshaw@oaktech.com>,
don@lexmark.com
cc: pwg-announce@pwg.org
Subject: RE: PWG-ANNOUNCE> Charter for XHTML-Print Working Group
As the Chairperson of the UPNP Imaging committee I am against starting a
separate working group to develop X-HTML Print. We are very close to
locking down the BasicPrint Service which requires X-HTML Print and I had
envisioned locking down the X-HTML Print document in parallel. It seems
that we are winding down the X-HTML Print discussions and are close to
agreement on a version of X-HTML Print that vendors could implement. In
fact, the current UPNP Print Committee schedule has the X-HTML Print
document listed as "done" by 3/31/01 with a subsequent vote to agree on
the
"final" version. I have concerns that a separate working committee to
develop X-HTML Print could prolong the entire process for a UPNP Print
standard.
Regards,
Shivaun Albright
_______________________________________________________________________
Shivaun Albright
Engineer Scientist
Internet Imaging and Printing Systems (iIPS)
Hewlett Packard
Roseville, CA
(916) 785-7191
_______________________________________________________________________
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ElliottBradshaw@oaktech.com [mailto:ElliottBradshaw@oaktech.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2001 2:09 PM
> To: don@lexmark.com
> Cc: pwg-announce@pwg.org
> Subject: Re: PWG-ANNOUNCE> Charter for XHTML-Print Working Group
>
>
>
> Don,
>
> We won't be at the plenary (although Norbert will be in Tampa
> for the UPDF
> meeting) so here is our two cents.
>
> PWG seems like the right home for XHTML-Print. We like the
> work you've
> done and hope it becomes final soon. I wonder what impact
> this will have
> on the timing within the UPnP group. Since the plan there has been to
> finalize this soon, would that vote go ahead? What happens if the PWG
> process makes changes afterwards? Perhaps PWG should vote on
> adopting the
> UPnP result lock stock and barrel, or else UPnP should just
> turn it over
> right away.
>
> Also, I assume a goal is to do this in a way that the
> Bluetooth folks can
> adopt it as well...true?
>
>
> ------------------------------------------
> Elliott Bradshaw
> Director, Software Engineering
> Oak Technology Imaging Group
> 781 638-7534
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> don@lexmark.com
>
> Sent by: To:
> pwg-announce@pwg.org
> owner-pwg-announ cc:
> melinda_grant@hp.com,
> ce@pwg.org
> fujisawa.jun@canon.co.jp,
>
> peter.zehler@usa.xerox.com
> Subject:
> PWG-ANNOUNCE> Charter for
> 02/27/01 04:23 XHTML-Print
> Working Group
> PM
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> A working group to develop the XHTML-Print "datastream" is
> being proposed
> for
> the PWG. I have included a pointer to a proposed charter
> which will be
> discussed at the PWG Plenary in Tampa.
>
> ftp://ftp.pwg.org.pub/pwg/xhtml-print/charter/XHTML-Print-Char
ter-01.doc
Comments should be sent to me or brought up at the Plenary in Tampa. A
mailing
list for this project has not yet been set up yet.
**********************************************
* Don Wright don@lexmark.com *
* Chair, Printer Working Group *
* Chair, IEEE MSC *
* *
* Director, Strategic & Technical Alliances *
* Lexmark International *
* 740 New Circle Rd *
* Lexington, Ky 40550 *
* 859-232-4808 (phone) 859-232-6740 (fax) *
**********************************************
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Apr 16 2009 - 10:55:40 EDT