From: Stuart Rowley (Stuart.Rowley@ktd-kyocera.com)
Date: Thu Jun 01 2006 - 16:41:51 EDT
Hi Ron,
I have a few questions about the MFP Alerts draft.
1. If there are no groups for scanDeviceCover or scanDeviceInput, why is
there a group for scanDeviceMediaPath?
2. If, for example, the scanner document feeder cover was open, then the
prtAlertTable entry would include prtAlertGroup = 6 (Cover), but then
the prtAlertGroupIndex should point to a cover in the prtCover table. So
now I have scan device covers implemented in the printer MIB, but other
scan device subunits in the MFP MIB?
3. In the examples in section 10.1.3 for the scanDeviceScanner group
there is Lamp Missing, subunitMissing(9) / subunitRemoved(26). What if I
have multiple subunits that could be missing? There is no way to tell
without using prtAlertGroupIndex to point to a table entry in the MFP
MIB?
Thanks,
Stuart
Stuart Rowley
Kyocera Technology Development
________________________________
From: pmp-owner@pwg.org [mailto:pmp-owner@pwg.org] On Behalf Of Bergman,
Ron
Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2006 8:49 AM
To: pmp@pwg.org
Subject: PMP> MFP Alerts Teleconference Scheduled for June 8
The next teleconference for MFP Alerts is scheduled for June 8, 2006 at
11:00 AM EDT (8:00 AM PDT).
Agenda:
1. Review previous meeting minutes
2. Continue review of the draft Alert Groups document
3. Start review of the Imaging System MIB
The latest version of the Alert Groups document is at:
ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/pmp/wd/wd-mfp-alert-groups10-20060601.pdf
Meeting access:
1-866-365-4406
Passcode: 2635888#
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 01 2006 - 16:41:38 EDT