Hi Bert,
Darn it - my typo. What it's supposed to say is:
(3) PrtAlertGroupTC - delete the erroneous comment
-- (2) is reserved for conformance information
(4) PrtAlertGroupTC - add
unknown(2), -- Not in RFC 1759
That is, we're only deleting an ASN.1 comment! Which
was added in RFC 3805 and was _wrong_ anyway - we don't
need to indicate that prtMIBConformance was the source
of an alert!
Cheers,
- Ira
Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect)
Blue Roof Music / High North Inc
PO Box 221 Grand Marais, MI 49839
phone: +1-906-494-2434
email: imcdonald@sharplabs.com
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wijnen, Bert (Bert) [mailto:bwijnen@lucent.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2005 11:03 AM
> To: McDonald, Ira; 'pmp@pwg.org'
> Subject: RE: PMP> Updates for IANA Printer MIB
>
>
> Inline
>
> Ira suggests these changes:
> > ----------
> >
> > (1) PrtCoverStatusTC - add
> > unknown(2), -- Not in RFC 1759
> >
> > (2) PrtChannelTypeTC - add
> > unknown(2), -- Not in RFC 1759
> >
> > (3) PrtAlertGroupTC - delete
> >
>
> If we want to get rid of it, then we do NOT delete it.
> That may break existing use (possibly existing use by
> people we do not know).
>
> So the best way to get rid of it is to obsolete it.
>
> > (4) PrtAlertGroupTC - add
> > unknown(2), -- Not in RFC 1759
> > -- (2) is reserved for conformance information
> >
>
> Hope this helps and can be agreed to.
>
> Bert
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jul 26 2005 - 13:07:32 EDT