PMP Mail Archive: Re: PMP> RE: Need clarification on the def

Re: PMP> RE: Need clarification on the definition of RFC 3805 'prtMarkerLi feCount' object

From: wamwagner@comcast.net
Date: Sun Jul 24 2005 - 14:21:56 EDT

Next message: Harry Lewis: "PMP> RE: Need clarification on the definition of RFC 3805 'prtMarkerLi feCount' object"

Previous message: wamwagner@comcast.net: "Re: PMP> RE: Need clarification on the definition of RFC 3805 'prtMarkerLi feCount' object"
Maybe in reply to: McDonald, Ira: "PMP> RE: Need clarification on the definition of RFC 3805 'prtMarkerLi feCount' object"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

I think this query brings up an interesting question about "author" references. Insofar as interest in an RFC or PWG document may outlive the participation of the individual authors, would it be reasonable to put the working group/mailing list as an author and contact? Or at least to indicate that queries should be addressed to the WG mailing list?

Bill Wagner

-------------- Original message --------------

> Hi Tom,
>
> Sorry I missed this the first time around. Wasn't sent to PMP
> mailing list, so it got killed by spam filters.
>

Next message: Harry Lewis: "PMP> RE: Need clarification on the definition of RFC 3805 'prtMarkerLi feCount' object"
Previous message: wamwagner@comcast.net: "Re: PMP> RE: Need clarification on the definition of RFC 3805 'prtMarkerLi feCount' object"
Maybe in reply to: McDonald, Ira: "PMP> RE: Need clarification on the definition of RFC 3805 'prtMarkerLi feCount' object"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jul 24 2005 - 14:21:40 EDT