PMP Mail Archive: RE: PMP> Restructured Port MIB (18 July 20

RE: PMP> Restructured Port MIB (18 July 2005)

From: McDonald, Ira (imcdonald@sharplabs.com)
Date: Tue Jul 19 2005 - 12:46:27 EDT

  • Next message: Bergman, Ron: "RE: PMP> Restructured Port MIB (18 July 2005)"

    Hi Bert,

    Thanks for your quick feedback. My replies inline below.

    Cheers,
    - Ira

    Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect)
    Blue Roof Music / High North Inc
    PO Box 221 Grand Marais, MI 49839
    phone: +1-906-494-2434
    email: imcdonald@sharplabs.com

    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: Wijnen, Bert (Bert) [mailto:bwijnen@lucent.com]
    > Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2005 9:08 AM
    > To: McDonald, Ira; 'pmp@pwg.org'
    > Subject: RE: PMP> Restructured Port MIB (18 July 2005)
    >
    >
    > Only did a very very quick scan.
    >
    > Comments.
    >
    > - ppmPortProtocolTargetPort OBJECT-TYPE
    > SYNTAX Integer32 (0..65535)
    > I propose that you use InetPortNumber TC from RFC4001
    >

    Won't work, because this port is not limited to Internet Suite
    protocols. The 'service:' URI in ppmPortServiceNameOrURI may
    also be for non-Internet suites (AppleTalk, NetWare, etc.).

    I'll correct the DESCRIPTION in the MIB and make clear that
    (as with the Printer MIB) ports/channels may be from multiple
    protocol suites.

    > - ppmPortProtocolType OBJECT-TYPE
    > SYNTAX Integer32 (0..2147483647)
    >
    > WHy not use TC PrtChannelTypeTC as the SYNTAX?
    > I do see that you want to use zero (meaning not supported).
    > But maybe better is to use none(1) in that case, or maybe
    > adding an enumeration to the TC of notSupported(xx) ??
    > It is now an IANA-maintained TC, so it should not be that
    > difficult to get a label added.
    >

    Won't work. PrtChannelTypeTC currently only defines 'other(1)'
    and (foolishly) does NOT define 'unknown(2)' (unlike every other
    textual convention in the Printer MIB). Because the Printer MIB
    v2 still doesn't define DEFVAL clauses for most objects, this
    oversight has not surfaced before. We could register 'unknown(2)'
    with IANA, but _not_ fast enough (because this MIB's going into OS
    and printer vendor products right now).

    > - ppmPortPrtChannelIndex has a reference to RFC1213, while I
    > think I would reather reference RFC2863 (the current IF-MIB)
    >
    > Bert
    >

    Agreed. My mistake from the old Printer MIB (RFC 1759).

    I'll correct the references in the MIB.
    - Ira

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jul 19 2005 - 12:46:38 EDT