PMP Mail Archive: RE: PMP> Restructured Port MIB (18 July 20

RE: PMP> Restructured Port MIB (18 July 2005)

From: Wijnen, Bert (Bert) (bwijnen@lucent.com)
Date: Tue Jul 19 2005 - 09:08:13 EDT

Next message: info@p-suke-soramame.com: "$BA*$P$l$?J}$N$_$KG[?.$7$F$$$^$9!#(B"

Previous message: McDonald, Ira: "PMP> Restructured Port MIB (18 July 2005)"
Maybe in reply to: McDonald, Ira: "PMP> Restructured Port MIB (18 July 2005)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Only did a very very quick scan.

Comments.

- ppmPortProtocolTargetPort OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX Integer32 (0..65535)
I propose that you use InetPortNumber TC from RFC4001

- ppmPortProtocolType OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX Integer32 (0..2147483647)

  WHy not use TC PrtChannelTypeTC as the SYNTAX?
  I do see that you want to use zero (meaning not supported).
  But maybe better is to use none(1) in that case, or maybe
  adding an enumeration to the TC of notSupported(xx) ??
  It is now an IANA-maintained TC, so it should not be that
  difficult to get a label added.

- ppmPortPrtChannelIndex has a reference to RFC1213, while I
think I would reather reference RFC2863 (the current IF-MIB)

Bert

Next message: info@p-suke-soramame.com: "$BA*$P$l$?J}$N$_$KG[?.$7$F$$$^$9!#(B"
Previous message: McDonald, Ira: "PMP> Restructured Port MIB (18 July 2005)"
Maybe in reply to: McDonald, Ira: "PMP> Restructured Port MIB (18 July 2005)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jul 19 2005 - 09:08:33 EDT