PMP Mail Archive: Re: PMP> Final call on Printer MIB changes

Re: PMP> Final call on Printer MIB changes

Jay Martin (jkm@underscore.com)
Thu, 08 Jul 1999 08:28:38 -0400

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Wagner,William: "RE: PMP> New Media Path Device alert"
Previous message: Jay Martin: "Re: PMP> New Media Path Device alert"
Maybe in reply to: lpyoung@lexmark.com: "PMP> Final call on Printer MIB changes"

> I agree with Jay on the positive versus negative voting issue. However, I
> would suggest that any proposed addition must receive at least one vote of
> support (a "second", if you will), and then the "negative response" voting
> scheme should work fine.

Excellent suggestion, Angelo. Given the realities of the PWG,
however, it would probably be best that such a "seconded" motion
come from someone from a company *other* than the original proposer.

...jay

Next message: Wagner,William: "RE: PMP> New Media Path Device alert"
Previous message: Jay Martin: "Re: PMP> New Media Path Device alert"
Maybe in reply to: lpyoung@lexmark.com: "PMP> Final call on Printer MIB changes"