I certainly support you position in this matter. This was the prior
agreement and we should stick to it.
If the IETF rejects the MIB for this reason, the subject should again be
opened and all proposals given a proper review. I don't recommend that we
add this patch at the eleventh hour.
Ron Bergman
Dataproducts Corp.
On Wed, 1 Apr 1998 lpyoung@lexmark.com wrote:
>
> Tom and Ira,
>
> You guys are certainly tenacious on this issue. My opinion is
> that this issue has been closed for some time and I do not
> see any new news that would justify opening this issue again.
> However if there are significant (close to unanimous) responses
> from members of the working group by Thursday April 2nd (tomorrow)
> stating that this issue and your proposal deserves a detailed review
> then I will agree to extend the closure date. If I do not see a huge
> rally in favor of this proposal (silence will be counted as being
> against this proposal) then the closure date of Thursday April 2nd
> will stand.
>
> Regards,
> Lloyd
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> Lloyd Young Lexmark International, Inc.
> Senior Program Manager Dept. C14L/Bldg. 035-3
> Strategic Alliances 740 New Circle Road NW
> internet: lpyoung@lexmark.com Lexington, KY 40550
> Phone: (606) 232-5150 Fax: (606) 232-6740
>
>
>