Yep, you're right. Somehow I missed the significance of the little
"pm" prefix in Harry's original proposal. I totally agree with your
suggestion.
...jay
----------------------------------------------------------------------
-- JK Martin | Email: jkm@underscore.com --
-- Underscore, Inc. | Voice: (603) 889-7000 --
-- 41C Sagamore Park Road | Fax: (603) 889-2699 --
-- Hudson, NH 03051-4915 | Web: http://www.underscore.com --
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ron Bergman wrote:
>
> I certainly agree with the intent of the proposal. The name, however,
> still looks strange. I believe that in Harry's original name the "pm" was
> to represent "preventive maintenance". So the revised name really should
> be:
>
> overduePreventiveMaintenance
>
> How does this sound?
>
> Ron Bergman
> Dataproducts Corp.
>
> On Thu, 11 Dec 1997, Harry Lewis wrote:
>
> > Yes, I like Jay's name better. Can we get consensus to add this to the current
> > hrPrinterDetectedErrorState bit extensions? By the way... what's the status
> > regarding these extensions and the hrMIB? For that matter, what's the status of
> > the Printer MIB?
> >
> > Harry Lewis - IBM Printing Systems
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > pmp-owner@pwg.org on 12/11/97 10:17:53 AM
> > Please respond to pmp-owner@pwg.org @ internet
> > To: Harry Lewis/Boulder/IBM@ibmus
> > cc: pmp@pwg.org @ internet
> > Subject: Re: PMP> Another hrBit
> >
> >
> > I'd agree with this proposal, so long as the name is changed to
> > better reflect the semantics. Maybe something like:
> >
> > pmOverduePreventiveMaintenance
> >
> > I know it's a bit long, but it clearly states the semantics and
> > scope of the variable.
> >
> > ...jay
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > -- JK Martin | Email: jkm@underscore.com --
> > -- Underscore, Inc. | Voice: (603) 889-7000 --
> > -- 41C Sagamore Park Road | Fax: (603) 889-2699 --
> > -- Hudson, NH 03051-4915 | Web: http://www.underscore.com --
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Harry Lewis wrote:
> > >
> > > I'd like to extend the proposal for new hrPrinterDetectedErrorState bits by
> > > adding one more bit
> > >
> > > > pmOverdue 6 warning(3) or down(5)
> > >
> > > This bit would be set if and when the device detected that a preventive
> > > maintenance
> > > schedule had been exceeded. It would be up to the implementation if this
> > > stops printing or not (typically, not!).
> > >
> > > Harry Lewis - IBM Printing Systems
> >
> >
> >