In any case, a number of other IETF standards track MIBs have
imported and used the 'InternationalDisplayString' textual
convention defined in the IETF HR MIB (RFC 1514), to mean
precisely what we're talking about now - relatively static
locale for a large number of site-specific string objects
(some or all with 'read-write' rather than 'read-only' MAX-ACCESS).
Damning the HR MIB as questionable is fairly absurd for a printer
working group who have a MIB with primary indices of 'hrDeviceIndex'
in all tables. At Xerox, everything built in the last year has
some or all of the IETF HR MIB tables in use. Maybe the
deficient printer status variables have blinded PWG folks to
the real utility of the HR MIB for network products (for service
and customer SA setup purposes).
Cheers,
- Ira McDonald (outside consultant at Xerox)