Thanks for the excellent description of SNMP traps. It agrees 100%
with my understanding of this subject with respect to v1. (As far
as v2 goes, I am only implementing v1.)
I have found the SNMP documents difficult to understand and it is
always nice to see and independent conclusion that supports my own.
I hope others in the group also find this document useful.
Does anyone disagree with Matt?
I also agree that RFC1759 does not need to be changed and I support
your recommendation to add this information to the FAQ.
Ron Bergman
Dataproducts Corp.