P1394 Mail Archive: Re: P1394> Revised PWG1394 Cmd Set

Re: P1394> Revised PWG1394 Cmd Set

Robert Morford (bob@sismicro.com)
Fri, 24 Jul 1998 10:36:11 -0700

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Greg Shue: "Re: P1394> Revised PWG1394 Cmd Set"
Previous message: Greg Shue: "Re: P1394> CONNECTION_STATE(Was Re: Revised PWG1394 Cmd Set)"
Maybe in reply to: Greg Shue: "P1394> Revised PWG1394 Cmd Set"
Next in thread: Greg Shue: "Re: P1394> Revised PWG1394 Cmd Set"

Greg Shue wrote:
>
> The target needs to communicate the following specific events
> to the initiator even in the case that no commands are queued.
>
> - UNIT ATTENTION: logical unit was reset outside of this Login
>
> - Target has closed a communication direction and will reject
> further TRANSPORT_?2?_DATA commands for that direction.
> When all directions are closed, then target is should
> Logout ASAP. (The target shall only successfully execute
> TRANSPORT_STATUS commands.)

Does this statement imply that the initiator doesn't need to
do a logout if it does both TRANSPORT_CLOSE(I2T) and (T2I)?
Perhaps you could reword "then target is should Logout ASAP"
to "Initiator should Logout ASAP" (since there are no other
valid actions).

-- 
Bob Morford (bob@sismicro.com)
SIS Microelectronics, Inc.
A Subsidiary of Aspec Technology, Inc.
1831 Lefthand Cir., Suite #E
Longmont, CO 80501
303-776-1667 x226

Next message: Greg Shue: "Re: P1394> Revised PWG1394 Cmd Set"
Previous message: Greg Shue: "Re: P1394> CONNECTION_STATE(Was Re: Revised PWG1394 Cmd Set)"
Maybe in reply to: Greg Shue: "P1394> Revised PWG1394 Cmd Set"
Next in thread: Greg Shue: "Re: P1394> Revised PWG1394 Cmd Set"