P1394 Mail Archive: RE: P1394> Rough SBP-2 & IP1394 core component ROM sizes

RE: P1394> Rough SBP-2 & IP1394 core component ROM sizes

Nagasaka Fumio (Nagasaka.Fumio@exc.epson.co.jp)
Fri, 13 Feb 1998 19:27:28 +0900

I agree with Stephen,
> Also, I don$B!G(Jt believe any of the chip manufacturers support SBP-2 for(J
both target and initiator.

Do we need to develop a firmware which supports two LINK ICs
one for initiator and one for target?
I think $B!H(Jyes$B!I(J. Because typical LINK IC has only one input FIFO in(J
each chip. And it is very difficult to implement two different software
stack utilizing one i/o channel.
--------------------------------------------
-------------------------------
Fumio Nagasaka
Epson Software Development Laboratory Inc.
Tel +81 268 25 4111, Fax +81 268 25 4627
E-mail to nagasaka.fumio@exc.epson.co.jp

-----Original Message-----
From: Stephen Holmstead [SMTP:stephen@hpb16977.boi.hp.
com]
Sent: Thursday, February 12, 1998 1:30 AM
To: 'Turner, Randy'; 'Brian Batchelder';
p1394@pwg.org
Subject: RE: P1394> Rough SBP-2 & IP1394 core
component ROM sizes

My experiences in the past is that combining target AND
initiator
functions into a single device is VERY difficult. The
complexity of the
state tables and ambiguities that can arise make it very
difficult.
Also, I don't believe any of the chip manufacturers
support SBP-2 for
both target and initiator. In my opinion, it's NOT just
a matter of
adding the 15K for the target and 15K for the initiator.
The target and
initiator have vastly different functions. Designing a
model that did
both (well) would be a challenge. It was problems like
this that fueled
many of the AEN (asynchronous event notification)
debates.

Stephen

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Turner, Randy [SMTP:rturner@sharplabs.com]
> Sent: Monday, February 09, 1998 1:03 PM
> To: 'Brian Batchelder'; p1394@pwg.org
> Subject: RE: P1394> Rough SBP-2 & IP1394 core
component ROM sizes
>
>
> I am very interested in the combined target/initiator
footprint as
> well.
>
> Thx
>
> Randy
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brian Batchelder
[SMTP:brianb@vcd.hp.com]
> Sent: Monday, February 09, 1998 9:37 AM
> To: p1394@pwg.org
> Subject: Re: P1394> Rough SBP-2 & IP1394
core component
> ROM sizes
>
> At 02:04 PM 2/6/98 -0800, Greg Shue wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> >I approached them about sharing some rough
estimates of code
> size
> >for the IP1394 glue, SBP-2 target and
initiator, and 1394 bus
> >manager modules to get a feel for how "heavy"
the protocol
> >implementations really are. They graciously
shared the flowing
> >estimates with us, and certainly deserve our
thanks. Since the
> >technology is still being developed, these
implementations are
> >certainly going to be tuned and the numbers
will change a
> little
> >bit.
> >
> > Component Rough ROM size
(KBytes)
> > ---------
-----------------------
> > SBP-2 initiator core 15 +/- 5
> > SBP-2 target core 15 +/- 5 (incl.
Mgmt+Fetch agent,
> no exec agent)
>
> Any idea how big a combined SBP-2
target/initiator would be?
> 15-30K? ;-)
>
> [snip]
>
> Brian
>
>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> ~
> Brian Batchelder | Hewlett-Packard |
> mailto:brianb@vcd.hp.com
> Connectivity Futurist | 1115 SE 164th Ave. |
Phone: (360)
> 212-4107
> DeskJet Printers | Vancouver, WA 98684 |
Fax: (360)
> 212-4227

Our website uses cookies on your device to give you the best user experience. By using our website, you agree to the placement of these cookies. To learn more, read our privacy policy. Read Privacy Policy