IPP Mail Archive: RE: IPP> FW: Diff files for IPP> Notif

RE: IPP> FW: Diff files for IPP> Notification Documents

From: Hastings, Tom N (hastings@cp10.es.xerox.com)
Date: Wed Jun 30 2004 - 15:24:28 EDT

  • Next message: Scott Hollenbeck: "RE: IPP> FW: Diff files for IPP> Notification Documents"

    Bob,
     
    I glanced through the changes and they look good. Thanks for taking the
    time, especially pro bono.
     
    One question though: The language of how to join the IPP DL was deleted:
     
    IPP Web Page: http://www.pwg.org/ipp/ prefix = o ns =
    "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" />

    IPP Mailing List: ipp@pwg.org

     

    To subscribe to the ipp mailing list, send the following email:

    1) send it to majordomo@pwg.org

    2) leave the subject line blank

    3) put the following two lines in the message body:

    subscribe ipp

    end

     

    Implementers of this specification document are encouraged to join the IPP
    Mailing List in order to participate in any discussions of clarification
    issues and review of registration proposals for additional attributes and
    values. In order to reduce spam the mailing list rejects mail from
    non-subscribers, so you must subscribe to the mailing list in order to send
    a question or comment to the mailing list.

     
    Was this deletion a request of the AD or RFC Editor? It seems useful to
    retain. The IPP DL will remain long after the IETF IPP WG is (finally)
    dissolved. Its the same text that we have had in all IPP RFCs, including
    RFC 2911.
     
    Tom
     

     -----Original Message-----
    From: owner-ipp@pwg.org [mailto:owner-ipp@pwg.org]On Behalf Of Robert
    Herriot
    Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2004 01:27
    To: McDonald, Ira; pwg-announce@pwg.org
    Cc: ipp@pwg.org
    Subject: Re: PWG-ANNOUNCE> FW: Diff files for IPP> Notification Documents

    I'm sorry that my reply is on pwg-announce. However, I need to respond to
    the Ira's email that he sent via pwg-announce.

    I hope that the PWG members are willing to accept the notification documents
    in their current form and will not request any changes or enhancements
    (small typos and errors excepted). In their current form, they are likely
    to be published as RFCs soon because IETF reviewers have made comments about
    the documents and I have made corrections that address IETF reviewers'
    suggestions. If I make changes beyond those requested by the IETF
    reviewers, there are two major problems.
    First, I don't have time to make major changes and no one else does either.
    I have offered to do only a small amount of pro-bono work. Second, the IETF
    review process would have to start all over again, and the reviewers have
    made it clear that they don't want to review the documents again. Unless
    these documents progress in essentially their current form, they run a very
    high risk of never being published by the IETF.

    I believe that it is best for the PWG to ensure that the IETF publish these
    3 documents, and that means that they must be published in their current
    form. If PWG wants to make extensions to these documents, such extensions
    should be published in new IEEE-ISTO documents via some new process that is
    a successor to the process that produced these documents.

    Bob Herriot

    At Tuesday 6/22/2004 07:18 PM, McDonald, Ira wrote:

    Hi,

    Bob Herriot has just finished doing minimal required
    changes to the three IPP Notification documents
    (requirements, base, and IPPGET delivery method)
    to respond to the pending IETF reviewer comments.

    If you don't like these semantics, this is your LAST
    chance to change them for IPP, before they move onto
    the IETF 'standards track'. Note that WIMS currently
    supports leases (for example) via different attributes.

    Cheers,
    - Ira

    Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect)
    Blue Roof Music / High North Inc
    PO Box 221 Grand Marais, MI 49839
    phone: +1-906-494-2434
    email: imcdonald@sharplabs.com

     
    -----Original Message-----
    From: owner-ipp@pwg.org [ mailto:owner-ipp@pwg.org
    <mailto:owner-ipp@pwg.org> ]On Behalf Of Robert
    Herriot
    Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2004 6:22 PM
    To: ipp@pwg.org
    Subject: Diff files for IPP> Documents

    I have uploaded .doc and .pdf files.

    Each file is the diff of the current Word file that is the source for the
    latest IETF draft against the Word file that was the source of the preceding
    IETF draft.

    ipp-notification-requirements-040621-rev.pdf
    ipp-notify-get-040621-rev.pdf
    ipp-not-spec-040621-rev.pdf

    and similar for .doc files.

    They are in the usual pwg/ipp/new_NOT directory.
    ..

    Bob Herriot



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jun 30 2004 - 15:22:54 EDT