IPP Mail Archive: RE: IPP> RE: [printing-jobticket] Print Qu

RE: IPP> RE: [printing-jobticket] Print Quality Issue resolution

From: Wagner,William (WWagner@NetSilicon.com)
Date: Thu Jul 10 2003 - 17:38:13 EDT

  • Next message: Harry Lewis: "Re: IPP> Print Quality Issue resolution"

    Yes, that may be a reasonable distinction. But it seems inconsistent with the statement that "'image' seemed the same as 'photo'. The name for this was changed to 'graphic'". But I may just be reading it wrong.

    Bill Wagner

    -----Original Message-----
    From: Mike Sweet [mailto:mike@easysw.com]
    Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 5:09 PM
    To: Wagner,William
    Cc: Zehler, Peter; IPP@pwg.org; printing-jobticket@freestandards.org;
    printing-driver@freestandards.org
    Subject: Re: IPP> RE: [printing-jobticket] Print Quality Issue
    resolution

    Wagner,William wrote:
    > Peter,
    >
    > Seems a reasonable resolution. However, since you state: ...the
    > value 'image' seemed the same as 'photo'. The name for this was
    > changed to 'graphic'.
    >
    > I do not understand why the values include both "Graphic" and
    > "Photo".:

    "Graphic" presumably means business graphics (lines, bars, graphs,
    and other computer-generated imagery), while "photo" means an actual
    photographic image.

    Some devices can be optimized for different types of output; e.g.,
    photo output might use a variable dot size mode on the device, while
    graphic output might use a single dot size mode for speed. Similarly,
    the resolution enhancements provided on laser printers are not all
    appropriate for all types of output.

    -- 
    ______________________________________________________________________
    Michael Sweet, Easy Software Products                  mike@easysw.com
    Printing Software for UNIX                       http://www.easysw.com
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jul 10 2003 - 17:38:47 EDT