IPP Mail Archive: IPP> Remaining issue in Document object sp

IPP> Remaining issue in Document object spec

From: Zehler, Peter (PZehler@crt.xerox.com)
Date: Tue Jul 01 2003 - 13:14:40 EDT

  • Next message: Danny.M.Brennan@kp.org: "IPP> Non-member submission from ["TAYLOR,BOB (HP-Vancouver,ex1)" <bobt@hp.com>]"

    All,
    I did not capture the resolution (if any) on the following issue from Dennis
    Carney.

    ISSUE:
    I definitely believe that we need a "Document-equivalent" of
    job-collation-type. It would have different semantics, since the Job level
    semantics include the concept of documents, but I believe that since it is
    useful to know whether a Job is doing collated or uncollated copies, it
    would also be useful to know the same for Documents.

    Proposed resolutions:
    <TH>I disagree. If we did add a Document attribute, it would need to have
    the same value as at the Job Level, since you can't collate some documents
    and not collate other documents in the same job. We don't duplicate on the
    Document object other Job level attributes that apply to the job as a whole,
    such as "job-name", "job-hold", "job-priority", "job-finishing".</TH>

    Before I put the updated document I would like to get consensus. Please
    respond on the IPP list.

    Opinions?
    Pete

                                    Peter Zehler
                                    XEROX
                                    Xerox Innovation Group
                                    Email: PZehler@crt.xerox.com
                                    Voice: (585) 265-8755
                                    FAX: (585) 422-7961
                                    US Mail: Peter Zehler
                                            Xerox Corp.
                                            800 Phillips Rd.
                                            M/S 128-25E
                                            Webster NY, 14580-9701



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jul 01 2003 - 13:15:27 EDT