IPP Mail Archive: Re: IPP> 2 more significant proposed incre

Re: IPP> 2 more significant proposed increases in conformance requirements for the IPP Document object spec

From: Mike Sweet (mike@easysw.com)
Date: Mon Apr 21 2003 - 21:49:06 EDT

Next message: Hastings, Tom N: "IPP> 25 additional agreements to IPP Document object spec during Thurs day's April 17, telecon"

Previous message: Dennis Carney: "IPP> Re: SM> 1 more significant proposed conformance change to the IPP Documen t object spec"
In reply to: Dennis Carney: "Re: IPP> 2 more significant proposed increases in conformance requirements for the IPP Document object spec"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Dennis Carney wrote:
>
>
>
> I think that these ideas are good ones. However, I wonder why we didn't do
> anything about this before. In fact, in 2911, it is specifically called
> out that we purposely didn't handle this situation (2911, section 3.2.6.1:
> "There is no mechanism to allow for the next 'M' jobs after the first 'N'
> jobs."). Does anyone remember whether there was a good reason this issue
> was sidestepped?
> ...

I dunno, however along with your comments I'd also like to bring up
another gap in the current spec for Get-Jobs - you can't get a list
of *all* jobs (both completed and not-completed). While we are
extending the Get-Jobs operation, it would be nice to add an "all"
keyword for "which-jobs".

(why do I suddenly feel like a politician adding an ammendment to
a law???)

-- 
______________________________________________________________________
Michael Sweet, Easy Software Products                  mike@easysw.com
Printing Software for UNIX                       http://www.easysw.com

Next message: Hastings, Tom N: "IPP> 25 additional agreements to IPP Document object spec during Thurs day's April 17, telecon"
Previous message: Dennis Carney: "IPP> Re: SM> 1 more significant proposed conformance change to the IPP Documen t object spec"
In reply to: Dennis Carney: "Re: IPP> 2 more significant proposed increases in conformance requirements for the IPP Document object spec"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Apr 21 2003 - 21:49:51 EDT