> Just in case you prefer a different format for RFCs with links for easier
> reading. However, each one doesn't have a Table of Contents. And its
only
> up to last RFC 3171 (October 31, 2001).
> Pete
> http://www.scit.wlv.ac.uk/rfc/
The one of these I've used for years is http://www.innosoft.com/rfc/. The
latter seems to be a better job of creating hyperlinks. It also preserves
page breaks.
Ned
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jun 12 2002 - 20:33:24 EDT