I've down loaded the .doc and .pdf files that are the same as the RFC (.txt)
file to the IPP WG web site. If there are any differences, then the .txt
file is the authority.
The .pdf file (and .doc) has line numbers to help with making comments on
the document.
Note: During proof reading, we missed that the RFC Editor moved all of the
abstract, except the first sentence, to the beginning of the Introduction.
I have left the abstract in the .doc and .pdf file as they should have been
in the RFC .txt file. Otherwise, I know of no differences between the
.doc/.pdf and the .txt version.
ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/new_IIG/rfc3196.pdf
ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/new_IIG/rfc3196.doc
ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/new_IIG/rfc3196.txt
Tom
-----Original Message-----
From: McDonald, Ira [mailto:IMcDonald@crt.xerox.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 09:10
To: 'ipp@pwg.org'
Subject: IPP> RFC 3196 - IPP/1.1 Implementers Guide - 4 Dec 2001
Importance: High
Hi folks,
Now available in the IETF RFC repository at:
ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc3196.txt
[This is the version before our most recent changes - Tom Hastings
will prepare the revised version in the next month or two and we'll
then have a second RFC that 'Obsoletes' the previous RFC 3196].
Special thanks to Tom Hastings and Pete Zehler for their work on this.
Cheers,
- Ira McDonald
High North Inc
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Dec 05 2001 - 20:02:09 EST