IPP Mail Archive: RE: IPP> NOT - ISSUE 05 [return successful

RE: IPP> NOT - ISSUE 05 [return successful-ok-events-complete']

From: Marty Joel (mjoel@netreon.com)
Date: Sat Aug 04 2001 - 04:56:52 EDT

  • Next message: Marty Joel: "Re: IPP> Re: NOT - ISSUE 04 in the IPPGET spec [Printer closing outbound channel connection only]"

    Hi Tom,

    Why require wait mode at all?

    Also, I commented about notify-get-interval on an earlier reply. I'd
    prefer replacing it with a boolean or a status code.

    Marty

    "Hastings, Tom N" <hastings@cp10.es.xerox.com>@pwg.org on 08/01/2001
    01:09:51 PM

    Sent by: owner-ipp@pwg.org

    To: Michael Sweet <mike@easysw.com>
    cc: "ipp (E-mail)" <ipp@pwg.org>, "McDonald, Ira"
          <imcdonald@sharplabs.com>, ipp@webpageassembler.com

    Subject: RE: IPP> NOT - ISSUE 05 [return successful-ok-events-complete']

    With this simplified Get-Notifications that only takes subscription-ids,
    would it be possible to REQUIRE a Printer to support Event Wait Mode for at
    least one connection as long as the identified Subscription Objects exist?

    A Notification Recipient client MUST still accept a "notify-get-interval"
    response from the Printer and try the Get-Notifications that many seconds
    later, if still interested in the events.

    OK?

    Tom

    -----Original Message-----
    From: Michael Sweet [mailto:mike@easysw.com]
    Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2001 10:53
    To: Hastings, Tom N
    Cc: ipp (E-mail); McDonald, Ira; ipp@webpageassembler.com
    Subject: Re: IPP> NOT - ISSUE 05 [return successful-ok-events-complete']

    "Hastings, Tom N" wrote:
    > ...
    > So lets simplify Get-Notifications as follows:
    >
    > 1. drop the "notify-recipient-uri" as an input operation attribute.
    >
    > 2. drop the "notify-search" (boolean) operation attribute.
    >
    > 3. Sender MUST supply one or more subscription-ids in the
    > "notify-subscription-ids: (1setOf integer(1:MAX)) operation attribute.
    >
    > 4. Sender MAY supply one or more parallel sequence-numbers in the
    > "notify-sequenced-numbers" (1setOf integer(1:MAX)) to eliminate getting
    > duplicates for the corresponding Subscription Object.

    Sounds good to me! 

    --
______________________________________________________________________
Michael Sweet, Easy Software Products                  mike@easysw.com
Printing Software for UNIX                       http://www.easysw.com

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Aug 04 2001 - 05:03:54 EDT