Hi Michael,
I'd like it shorter too. But isn't it too late? Aren't there already
ippget implementations?
Marty
Michael Sweet <mike@easysw.com>@pwg.org on 07/17/2001 05:43:33 AM
Sent by: owner-ipp@pwg.org
To: "Hastings, Tom N" <hastings@cp10.es.xerox.com>
cc: ipp@pwg.org, mjoel@netreon.com
Subject: Re: IPP> Re: IPPGET allowing the Printer to request the client to
disconnect
"Hastings, Tom N" wrote:
>
> Marty,
>
> So to be clear, if there are more connections than the Printer wants to
> commit to IPPGET wait connections, the Printer can return the
> "suggested-ask-again-time-interval" along with any events that haven't
> elapsed. The client should then disconnect AFTER getting the response.
My
> understanding is that if the Printer disconnects right way, that the
> response may not get back to the client.
My $0.02: Can we choose shorter attribute names, e.g.:
notify-get-interval
or:
notify-ippget-interval
???
-- ______________________________________________________________________ Michael Sweet, Easy Software Products mike@easysw.com Printing Software for UNIX http://www.easysw.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jul 17 2001 - 12:52:09 EDT