IPP Mail Archive: RE: IPP> Proposed deletions and additions

RE: IPP> Proposed deletions and additions to Media Types for Medi a Std

From: Bergman, Ron (Ron.Bergman@Hitachi-hkis.com)
Date: Fri May 18 2001 - 18:29:31 EDT

  • Next message: Bergman, Ron: "IPP> Media Standardized Names, version D0.9 is now available"

    Done!

            Ron

    -----Original Message-----
    From: Hastings, Tom N [mailto:hastings@cp10.es.xerox.com]
    Sent: Friday, May 18, 2001 3:23 PM
    To: Michael Sweet; Hastings, Tom N
    Cc: Bergman, Ron; ipp (E-mail); IMAGING@forum.upnp.org
    Subject: RE: IPP> Proposed deletions and additions to Media Types for
    Medi a Std

    Yes, lets get rid of coating for the 'stationery-inkjet' media type. That
    is just one way.

    Tom

    -----Original Message-----
    From: Michael Sweet [mailto:mike@easysw.com]
    Sent: Friday, May 18, 2001 14:07
    To: Hastings, Tom N
    Cc: Bergman, Ron; ipp (E-mail); IMAGING@forum.upnp.org
    Subject: Re: IPP> Proposed deletions and additions to Media Types for
    Media Std

    "Hastings, Tom N" wrote:
    > ...
    > stationery-inkjet
    > Separately cut sheets of an opaque material whose coating [on both sides]
    > is designed to minimize the spread of liquid inks

    Many inkjet papers don't have a coating at all, right? I hate to
    quibble, but how about:

      stationery-inkjet
      Separately cut sheets of an opaque material that can be printed on
      both sides and is designed to minimize the spread of liquid inks
                        ^^^^ could also be "coated"

    This makes it truly generic with regards to coating - the glossy and
    matte types can be used to specify a particular finish. 

    -- 
______________________________________________________________________
Michael Sweet, Easy Software Products                  mike@easysw.com
Printing Software for UNIX                       http://www.easysw.com

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri May 18 2001 - 18:28:30 EDT