IPP Mail Archive: Re: IPP> Proposed deletions and additions

Re: IPP> Proposed deletions and additions to Media Types for Media Std

From: Michael Sweet (mike@easysw.com)
Date: Fri May 18 2001 - 10:13:32 EDT

Next message: Bergman, Ron: "RE: IPP> RE: Revised ABNF per Monday's Phone Conference [ABNF and the Registration procedures]"

Previous message: Hastings, Tom N: "RE: IPP> RE: Revised ABNF per Monday's Phone Conference [ABNF and the Registration procedures]"
In reply to: Hastings, Tom N: "RE: IPP> Proposed deletions and additions to Media Types for Medi a Std"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

"Hastings, Tom N" wrote:
>
> But leave in the two-sided for the stationery-coated, stationery-
> glossy, and stationery-matte, correct?

For the purposes of defining the media type, it's probably best to
keep both photo and stationary media ambigious (e.g. "may or may not
be coated on both sides") than to say something specific. These are
already generalized names anyways, and in actual use (media-col, etc.)
we have the means of identifying more specific requirements.

-- 
______________________________________________________________________
Michael Sweet, Easy Software Products                  mike@easysw.com
Printing Software for UNIX                       http://www.easysw.com

Next message: Bergman, Ron: "RE: IPP> RE: Revised ABNF per Monday's Phone Conference [ABNF and the Registration procedures]"
Previous message: Hastings, Tom N: "RE: IPP> RE: Revised ABNF per Monday's Phone Conference [ABNF and the Registration procedures]"
In reply to: Hastings, Tom N: "RE: IPP> Proposed deletions and additions to Media Types for Medi a Std"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri May 18 2001 - 10:16:27 EDT