Ron,
I agree that if "bubble jet" is a Canon trademark or if a "bubble jet" is
really Canon's name for an ink jet printer, that we shouldn't include
"bubble jet" in the description. I should have asked about this at the
meeting.
What do other think?
Thanks,
Tom
-----Original Message-----
From: Bergman, Ron [mailto:Ron.Bergman@Hitachi-hkis.com]
Sent: Friday, April 27, 2001 15:19
To: 'Hastings, Tom N'; ipp (E-mail)
Subject: RE: IPP> MED - Definition of 'stationery-coated' Media Type for
u se by ink jet and bubble jet printers
Tom,
Isn't "bubble jet" a trade mark for a Canon ink jet printer? If so,
the spec should only say "...for use in ink jet printers."
Ron
-----Original Message-----
From: Hastings, Tom N [mailto:hastings@cp10.es.xerox.com]
Sent: Friday, April 27, 2001 2:59 PM
To: ipp (E-mail)
Subject: IPP> MED - Definition of 'stationery-coated' Media Type for use
by ink jet and bubble jet printers
While writing up the minutes of the Media standard it seemed that the
'stationery-coated' Media Type should mention coating, so I'd like to
suggest that we add the phrase "whose coating is designed " to get:
Separately cut sheets of an opaque material whose coating is designed for
use in ink jet and bubble jet printers
Ok?
Thanks,
Tom
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Apr 27 2001 - 19:01:45 EDT