IPP Mail Archive: Re: IPP> IPP Bake-Off 3 Issue 6

Re: IPP> IPP Bake-Off 3 Issue 6

From: Carl Kugler/Boulder/IBM (kugler@us.ibm.com)
Date: Fri Oct 27 2000 - 15:24:10 EDT

Next message: Carl Kugler/Boulder/IBM: "Re: IPP> Bake Off 3 issue 1"

Previous message: Carl Kugler/Boulder/IBM: "Re: IPP> IPP Bake-Off 3 Implementation specific issues: BO3-IMP-4"
Maybe in reply to: Zehler, Peter: "IPP> IPP Bake-Off 3 Issue 6"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

"Zehler, Peter" <Peter.Zehler@u...> wrote:
> All,
>
> BO3-6: Are there suffixes to "printer-state-reasons" value "none" (i.e.
> none-error & none-report)?
> Proposed Resolution: There are no suffixes used for the value "none".
>

I think your proposed resolution would break existing conforming
implementations. I propose: " If the value is 'none', the suffix is
OPTIONAL.

-Carl

Next message: Carl Kugler/Boulder/IBM: "Re: IPP> Bake Off 3 issue 1"
Previous message: Carl Kugler/Boulder/IBM: "Re: IPP> IPP Bake-Off 3 Implementation specific issues: BO3-IMP-4"
Maybe in reply to: Zehler, Peter: "IPP> IPP Bake-Off 3 Issue 6"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Oct 27 2000 - 15:36:50 EDT