IPP Mail Archive: Re: IPP> PPE - Issue about adding "me

Re: IPP> PPE - Issue about adding "media-size" by name in addition to "media-size" by dimensions

From: Michael Sweet (mike@easysw.com)
Date: Tue Sep 19 2000 - 09:47:22 EDT

Next message: Norbert Schade: "Re: IPP> PPE - Issue about adding "media-size" by name in addition to "media-size" by dimensions"

Previous message: Roelof Hamberg: "Re: IPP> PPE - Issue about adding "media-size" by name in addition to "media-size" by dimensions"
In reply to: Hastings, Tom N: "IPP> PPE - Issue about adding "media-size" by name in addition to "med ia-size" by dimensions"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

"Hastings, Tom N" wrote:
> ...
> OK to go back to the original specification with
> just "media-size" (collection) in which only the dimensions in
> hundredths of a millimeter (equivalent to 1/2540 th of an inch
> resolution)?

Dimensions are the best choice, if we have to choose a single
format. It might be good to include a table in the spec that
maps certain standard values to common ISO or US sizes; that
will avoid problems with some developers rounding and others
truncating the fractional measurement values.

-- 
______________________________________________________________________
Michael Sweet, Easy Software Products                  mike@easysw.com
Printing Software for UNIX                       http://www.easysw.com

Next message: Norbert Schade: "Re: IPP> PPE - Issue about adding "media-size" by name in addition to "media-size" by dimensions"
Previous message: Roelof Hamberg: "Re: IPP> PPE - Issue about adding "media-size" by name in addition to "media-size" by dimensions"
In reply to: Hastings, Tom N: "IPP> PPE - Issue about adding "media-size" by name in addition to "med ia-size" by dimensions"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Sep 19 2000 - 10:15:27 EDT