Please give me more context, such as document version and line number.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: McDonald, Ira [mailto:imcdonald@sharplabs.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2000 7:58 AM
> To: 'Herriot, Robert'; McDonald, Ira; 'jkm@underscore.com'
> Cc: 'ned.freed@innosoft.com'; ipp@pwg.org
> Subject: RE: IPP>NOT mailto feature from IETF meeting (RE: IPP> ADM -
> The IPPNotification I-Ds will now go the IESG)]
>
>
> Hi Bob,
>
> So I checked again (as I did yesterday). Bottom of page 16
> for message body content says MUST for a list of localized
> content.
>
> That has to be fixed.
>
> Cheers,
> - Ira
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Herriot, Robert [mailto:Robert.Herriot@pahv.xerox.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2000 1:48 PM
> To: McDonald, Ira; Herriot, Robert; 'jkm@underscore.com'
> Cc: 'ned.freed@innosoft.com'; ipp@pwg.org
> Subject: RE: IPP>NOT mailto feature from IETF meeting (RE: IPP> ADM -
> The IPPNotification I-Ds will now go the IESG)]
>
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: McDonald, Ira [mailto:imcdonald@sharplabs.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2000 1:24 PM
> > To meet your (and other PWG members) desires, simply
> > delete all language about the content OR change it
> > be SHOULD (RECOMMENDED) and punt on testing.
>
> The language in the spec has said "SHOULD" all along.
>
> We have tried to recommend content in a general way and leave
> the specific
> phrasing to the vendor. For example, we recommend that a
> printer name be
> present, but let the vendor choose the words.
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Aug 23 2000 - 17:53:07 EDT