RE: IPP> machine readable etc. - why Harry is right

• Previous message: Herriot, Robert: "RE: IPP>NOT mailto feature from IETF meeting (RE: IPP> ADM - The IPPNotification I-Ds will now go the IESG)]"
• Maybe in reply to: pmoore@peerless.com: "IPP> machine readable etc. - why Harry is right"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Carl Kugler/Boulder/IBM [mailto:kugler@us.ibm.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2000 12:52 PM
> For
> example, you do a Print-Job request, and get back a chunked
> response. The
> first chunk contains the normal Print-Job response. Additional chunks
> follow (later), containing notifications about the job
> progress. This is
> efficient enough for page-by-page notifications.

But would the chunks be so conveniently divided in an off-the-shelf web
server?

• Next message: Carl Kugler/Boulder/IBM: "RE: IPP> machine readable etc. - why Harry is right"
• Previous message: Herriot, Robert: "RE: IPP>NOT mailto feature from IETF meeting (RE: IPP> ADM - The IPPNotification I-Ds will now go the IESG)]"
• Maybe in reply to: pmoore@peerless.com: "IPP> machine readable etc. - why Harry is right"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Aug 22 2000 - 16:17:34 EDT