IPP Mail Archive: RE: IPP>NOT mailto feature from IETF meeti

RE: IPP>NOT mailto feature from IETF meeting (RE: IPP> ADM -TheI PPNotification I-Ds will now go the IESG)]

From: Manros, Carl-Uno B (cmanros@cp10.es.xerox.com)
Date: Fri Aug 18 2000 - 15:33:40 EDT

Next message: Herriot, Robert: "IPP> RE: Review of Event Notification Specification"

Previous message: ned.freed@innosoft.com: "Re: IPP>NOT mailto feature from IETF meeting (RE: IPP> ADM -TheIPPNotification I-Ds will now go the IESG)]"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Jay,

The relevant documents for SMTP notifications are:

- RFC 1891 and 1894 for Delivery Notifications
- RFC 2298 for Message Disposition Notification

Carl-Uno

-----Original Message-----
From: Jay Martin [mailto:jkm@underscore.com]
Sent: Friday, August 18, 2000 11:18 AM
To: ned.freed@innosoft.com
Cc: ipp@pwg.org
Subject: Re: IPP>NOT mailto feature from IETF meeting (RE: IPP> ADM
-TheIPPNotification I-Ds will now go the IESG)]

Ned,

> Then, when NOTARY, with its structured report format came out...

Can you give us a very brief summary of what NOTARY is, and perhaps
a pointer or two to some online info?

...jay

Next message: Herriot, Robert: "IPP> RE: Review of Event Notification Specification"
Previous message: ned.freed@innosoft.com: "Re: IPP>NOT mailto feature from IETF meeting (RE: IPP> ADM -TheIPPNotification I-Ds will now go the IESG)]"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Aug 18 2000 - 15:42:33 EDT