IPP Mail Archive: RE: IPP> NOT - Are we ready to start Last

RE: IPP> NOT - Are we ready to start Last Call on the "ipp-get" Notification Delivery Method?

From: Carl-Uno Manros (carl@manros.com)
Date: Thu Aug 17 2000 - 18:32:50 EDT

  • Next message: papowell@astart.com: "Re: IPP>NOT mailto feature from IETF meeting (RE: IPP> ADM - TheIPPNotification I-Ds will now go the IESG)]"

    It was announced on this DL earlier today, just back up a few messages....

    Carl-Uno

    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: owner-ipp@pwg.org [mailto:owner-ipp@pwg.org]On Behalf Of
    > pmoore@peerless.com
    > Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2000 3:16 PM
    > To: Manros, Carl-Uno B
    > Cc: jkm@underscore.com; Manros, Carl-Uno B; IETF-IPP
    > Subject: RE: IPP> NOT - Are we ready to start Last Call on the "ipp-get"
    > Notification Delivery Method?
    >
    >
    > where is the ipp-get spec?
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > "Manros, Carl-Uno B" <cmanros@cp10.es.xerox.com> on 08/17/2000 11:53:10 AM
    >
    > To: jkm@underscore.com, "Manros, Carl-Uno B" <cmanros@cp10.es.xerox.com>
    > cc: IETF-IPP <ipp@pwg.org> (bcc: Paul Moore/AUCO/US)
    >
    > Subject: RE: IPP> NOT - Are we ready to start Last Call on the "ipp-get"
    > Notification Delivery Method?
    >
    >
    >
    > Jay,
    >
    > As we have said that the 'mailto' and 'indp' methods are ones that we want
    > to focus on in our next bake-off, I think that most implementers will be
    > busy working on those for the next two months. So I see no strong
    > reason to
    > rush them out yet, other than the fact that we have debated them for more
    > than a year already, and I would like to reach closure on
    > notifications and
    > move on...
    >
    > Carl-Uno
    >
    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: Jay Martin [mailto:jkm@underscore.com]
    > Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2000 11:34 AM
    > To: Manros, Carl-Uno B
    > Cc: IETF-IPP
    > Subject: Re: IPP> NOT - Are we ready to start Last Call on the "ipp-get"
    > Notification Delivery Method?
    >
    >
    > Carl-Uno,
    >
    > Is there some kind of pressing deadline to get this out the door?
    >
    > The reason I ask is that I would like to spend a lot more time
    > reviewing the specs given the recent thread.
    >
    > Unfortunately, I wouldn't be able to submit my comments until
    > early the week of Aug 28. Can the Last Call happen the end
    > of that week?
    >
    > ...jay
    >
    >
    > "Manros, Carl-Uno B" wrote:
    > >
    > > All,
    > >
    > > We just got the latest version of the "ipp-get" Notification Delivery
    > Method
    > > back from the IETF secretariat.
    > >
    > > Earlier discussions indicated that we would be ready to send
    > that and the
    > > SNMP Method out for WG Last Call.
    > >
    > > Is that still the case, in the light of the discussions on the
    > DL over the
    > > last few days?
    > >
    > > If I don't hear any objections, I plan to send out the "ipp-get" and
    > "SNMP"
    > > delivery methods for Last Call early next week.
    > >
    > > Our original intention was that at least one of the delivery
    > methods could
    > > be used by the QUALDOCS project...
    > >
    > > Carl-Uno
    > >
    > > Carl-Uno Manros
    > > Principal Engineer - Xerox Architecture Center - Xerox Corporation
    > > 701 S. Aviation Blvd., El Segundo, CA, M/S: ESAE-231
    > > Phone +1-310-333 8273, Fax +1-310-333 5514
    > > Email: manros@cp10.es.xerox.com
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Aug 17 2000 - 18:40:46 EDT