Jay,
As we have said that the 'mailto' and 'indp' methods are ones that we want
to focus on in our next bake-off, I think that most implementers will be
busy working on those for the next two months. So I see no strong reason to
rush them out yet, other than the fact that we have debated them for more
than a year already, and I would like to reach closure on notifications and
move on...
Carl-Uno
-----Original Message-----
From: Jay Martin [mailto:jkm@underscore.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2000 11:34 AM
To: Manros, Carl-Uno B
Cc: IETF-IPP
Subject: Re: IPP> NOT - Are we ready to start Last Call on the "ipp-get"
Notification Delivery Method?
Carl-Uno,
Is there some kind of pressing deadline to get this out the door?
The reason I ask is that I would like to spend a lot more time
reviewing the specs given the recent thread.
Unfortunately, I wouldn't be able to submit my comments until
early the week of Aug 28. Can the Last Call happen the end
of that week?
...jay
"Manros, Carl-Uno B" wrote:
>
> All,
>
> We just got the latest version of the "ipp-get" Notification Delivery
Method
> back from the IETF secretariat.
>
> Earlier discussions indicated that we would be ready to send that and the
> SNMP Method out for WG Last Call.
>
> Is that still the case, in the light of the discussions on the DL over the
> last few days?
>
> If I don't hear any objections, I plan to send out the "ipp-get" and
"SNMP"
> delivery methods for Last Call early next week.
>
> Our original intention was that at least one of the delivery methods could
> be used by the QUALDOCS project...
>
> Carl-Uno
>
> Carl-Uno Manros
> Principal Engineer - Xerox Architecture Center - Xerox Corporation
> 701 S. Aviation Blvd., El Segundo, CA, M/S: ESAE-231
> Phone +1-310-333 8273, Fax +1-310-333 5514
> Email: manros@cp10.es.xerox.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Aug 17 2000 - 15:05:44 EDT