IPP Mail Archive: RE: IPP>NOT mailto feature from IETF meeti

RE: IPP>NOT mailto feature from IETF meeting (RE: IPP> ADM - The IPP Notification I-Ds will now go the IESG)

From: Herriot, Robert (Robert.Herriot@pahv.xerox.com)
Date: Tue Aug 15 2000 - 21:38:31 EDT

Next message: McDonald, Ira: "RE: IPP> TES - Bake-Off Phone conference"

Previous message: Hastings, Tom N: "IPP> NOT - mailto comment: what if Printer isn't yet configured to SM TP server?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

-----Original Message-----
From: Jay Martin [mailto:jkm@underscore.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2000 5:54 PM

IMHO, the primary question on the table is:

What compelling scenarios exist that drive the requirement for binary
notification data embedded in an email message?

[rgh] I'm still waiting to hear if anyone sees a real need for this feature
(i.e they really plan to put it into a product).

So far, I've heard of no need for this feature in any products. If the same
is true by COB on Thursday 8/17/00, I will recommend that we not add this
feature to the "mailto" draft.

Next message: McDonald, Ira: "RE: IPP> TES - Bake-Off Phone conference"
Previous message: Hastings, Tom N: "IPP> NOT - mailto comment: what if Printer isn't yet configured to SM TP server?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Aug 15 2000 - 21:49:50 EDT