To be a compliant IPP printer you do have to support other operations. To be a compliant IPP client you choose what functionality your users need, which may be a subset of the required operations. Right? Thus, a manufacturer of cell phones could follow Peter's example for simple job submission and claim 100% interoperability/compatibility with IPP printers. It can be that simple.
-Hugo
>>> "Manros, Carl-Uno B" <cmanros@cp10.es.xerox.com> 07/20/00 05:48PM >>>
Paul,
I looked at your attachment, which gives details about the minimum to send
a print job. However, to be compliant with IPP/1.0 or IPP/1.1 you also
have to support a number of other operations.
Carl-Uno
Carl-Uno Manros
Principal Engineer - Xerox Architecture Center - Xerox Corporation
701 S. Aviation Blvd., El Segundo, CA, M/S: ESAE-231
Phone +1-310-333 8273, Fax +1-310-333 5514
Email: manros@cp10.es.xerox.com
-----Original Message-----
From: pmoore@peerless.com [mailto:pmoore@peerless.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2000 3:22 PM
To: Manros, Carl-Uno B
Cc: pradip@iww.com; IETF-IPP
Subject: RE: IPP> ADM - Examples
Tom and peter did post a complete wire encoding example of the simpest
possible
print job (this will help)
"Hastings, Tom N" <hastings@CP10.ES.XEROX.COM> on 07/13/2000 12:17:38 PM
Please respond to "Hastings, Tom N" <hastings@CP10.ES.XEROX.COM>
To: IMAGING@FORUM.UPNP.ORG
cc: (bcc: Paul Moore/AUCO/US)
Subject: Peter Zehler's action item: Simple job submission in IPP
Here is Peter's action item from this weeks meeting:
Describe Simple job submission in IPP
Tom Hastings
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jul 21 2000 - 11:47:15 EDT