Hi Anthony,
Have you read RFC 2805 'URLs for Telephony' (April 2000)?
The fellow who developed it for the IESG is at Nokia and
wrote a series of I-Ds last year on a URL for GSM Short
Message Service. Perhaps we should send him a note?
In any case, expressing telephone numbers in URLs
(for voice, modem, fax, and any other service) is already
standardized in RFC 2805 (Proposed Standard), so we want
to use this prior art, right?
Cheers,
- Ira McDonald
High North Inc
-----Original Message-----
From: Anthony.Porter@xeikon.com [mailto:Anthony.Porter@xeikon.com]
Sent: Friday, June 30, 2000 8:32 AM
To: imcdonald@sharplabs.com; Anthony.Porter@xeikon.com;
cmanros@cp10.es.xerox.com; ipp@pwg.org; sasaki@jci.co.jp
Subject: RE: IPP> ADM - Pick your favorite notification delivery method
by July 7
Ira,
Yes, I would be interested, although I think there might be some confusion
between specifying a pager or short message service as an IPP notification
mechanism and actualy implementing it. Implementations are likely to differ
between countries. The original IPP notification spec had a provision for
pager notification, and that was all we needed.
I think that the special requirements of SMS may be similar to the Japanese
i-mode. Even if it is possible to request an i-mode notification as an
email, it might be better to treat it as a pager/short message notification
for IPP purposes.
Perhaps Yuji Sasaki is interested in joining in.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: McDonald, Ira [mailto:imcdonald@sharplabs.com]
> Sent: Friday, June 30, 2000 0:23
> To: 'Anthony.Porter@xeikon.com'; cmanros@cp10.es.xerox.com;
> ipp@pwg.org
> Subject: RE: IPP> ADM - Pick your favorite notification
> delivery method
> by July 7
>
>
> Hi Anthony,
>
> I've been mentioning SMS in IPP Telecons for months
> since the talk of Instant Messaging notifications
> first came up. But I don't think many of the IPP
> WG list members are very familiar with SMS - I think
> it's a good delivery method and should benefit by
> the 'human-readable' format work being done for the
> email (SMTP) mapping.
>
> Are you interested in writing or collaborating (with me)
> on an I-D on the use of SMS for IPP Notifications?
>
> Cheers,
> - Ira McDonald, consulting architect at Xerox and Sharp
> High North Inc
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Anthony.Porter@xeikon.com [mailto:Anthony.Porter@xeikon.com]
> Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2000 5:04 AM
> To: cmanros@cp10.es.xerox.com; ipp@pwg.org
> Subject: RE: IPP> ADM - Pick your favorite notification
> delivery method
> by July 7
>
>
> Has the possibility for supporting SMS/Pager notifications
> been dropped? I
> dont find anything about in the Notification spec.
>
> In Europe now almost every man woman and child has an SMS
> phone, so SMS
> would be the notification method of choice where a human is
> the recipient.
> I think it is even more important than email notification.
> Our printers are
> usually located remotely from the customer submitting the
> job, so IPP is
> useful for that. On the other hand the person who is going
> to pick up the
> printed output will usually be travelling around. Many are freelance
> graphic designers. For them, an SMS notification is perfect.
> Another point
> is that the machine operator is usually wandering around
> doing all sorts of
> jobs, so SMS is the ideal way to notify the operator of any
> abnormal machine
> conditions.
>
> For our customers I think SMS is by far the most important
> notification
> mechanism, so we would implement that first and then think
> about maybe doing
> some of the others. Old style pagers seem to have gone the
> way of 8-track
> stereo.
>
> Xeikon NV
> Anthony Porter
> Project Consultant
> Tel: +32 34 43 17 54 Fax: +32 34 43 14 48
> Mobile (and SMS): +32 75 73 66 39
> Mailto:anthony.porter@xeikon.com
> Vredenbaan 72
> B-2640 Mortsel, Belgium
> Tel: +32 34 43 13 11
> Fax: +32 34 43 13 09
> http://www.xeikon.com Mailto:info@xeikon.com
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 30 2000 - 12:04:59 EDT