If you think e-mail DISCUSSION is disruptive, just imaging getting print
job notifications in your e-mail too!
Harry Lewis
IBM Printing Systems
don@lexmark.com
Sent by: owner-ipp@pwg.org
06/23/2000 10:34 AM
To: ipp@pwg.org
cc:
Subject: IPP> "Discussions" (read arguments) over e-mail
I find this method of working an issue to be terrible. E-mail is terribly
disruptive and hard to follow. By the time the next post comes in, I've
forgotten the next set of points to be made.
Ever heard of lawyers arguing a case before a Judge over e-mail. I rest
my
case!! :>)
(geez... I can't believe I made my point by using a lawyer as a GOOD
example.)
**********************************************
* Don Wright don@lexmark.com *
* Chair, Printer Working Group *
* Chair, IEEE MSC *
* *
* Director, Strategic & Technical Alliances *
* Lexmark International *
* 740 New Circle Rd *
* Lexington, Ky 40550 *
* 859-232-4808 (phone) 859-232-6740 (fax) *
* (Former area code until 10/1 was 606) *
**********************************************
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 23 2000 - 13:41:27 EDT