IPP> Re: Minutes of IPP Working Group Meeting April 4-5, 2000

• Previous message: Carl Kugler: "IPP> Minutes of IPP Working Group Meeting April 4-5, 2000"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> 2.13 Set 2 and Set 3 Operations
> The group questioned whether or not any vendor would actually implement these operations.
> There was also a general question of procedure with regard to submitting new Operations
proposals.
> A few people are concerned that the additional operations add too much complexity to justify the expected benefit.
> Until someone actually (re-)confirms that the proposed operations are desirable, it was suggested that they could be deferred.

We plan to implement them, eventually. What's wrong with having them as standardized, optional extensions? Then, if you don't need them, you needn't be bothered by the complexity. I confirm that they're desirable.

    -Carl

 ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/minutes/ipp-minutes-000404.txt

• application/octet-stream attachment: ipp-minutes-000404.txt.url

• Next message: Carl-Uno Manros: "RE: IPP> Minutes of IPP Working Group Meeting April 4-5, 2000"
• Previous message: Carl Kugler: "IPP> Minutes of IPP Working Group Meeting April 4-5, 2000"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Apr 27 2000 - 11:10:45 EDT