IPP Mail Archive: RE: IPP> OPS - Do we want the "printe

RE: IPP> OPS - Do we want the "printer-xri-supported" definition to site the SLP or LDPA directory schema or not?

From: Hastings, Tom N (hastings@cp10.es.xerox.com)
Date: Thu Mar 09 2000 - 03:10:32 EST

  • Next message: Hastings, Tom N: "IPP> OPS - Updated IPP Job and Printer Set Operations - including -01 I-D .txt files"

    I agree that we should add the references to the [ipp-mod] Appendix on
    Directory schema when we publish as RFCs working with the RFC Editor.

    However, I've already updated the Set documents with the references as the
    place where the "printer-xri-supported" (1setOf collection) is defined,
    which is also a natural place.

    Tom

    -----Original Message-----
    From: Carl-Uno Manros [mailto:carl@manros.com]
    Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2000 21:57
    To: Hastings, Tom N; ipp
    Subject: RE: IPP> OPS - Do we want the "printer-xri-supported"
    definition to site the SLP or LDPA directory schema or not?

    Tom,

    I suggest not.

    If we want to reference them I think a better place for the reference would
    be in the IPP/1.1 Model & Semantics document where we have a Directory
    section. Maybe we can add that as an informational reference before it get
    published as RFC.

    Carl-Uno

    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: owner-ipp@pwg.org [mailto:owner-ipp@pwg.org]On Behalf Of Hastings,
    > Tom N
    > Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2000 6:17 PM
    > To: ipp
    > Subject: IPP> OPS - Do we want the "printer-xri-supported" definition to
    > site the SLP or LDPA directory schema or not?
    >
    >
    > Do we want the "printer-xri-supported" definition in the "Job and Printer
    > Set operation spec to site the SLP or LDPA directory schema or not?
    >
    > If so, I need the complete references to them.
    >
    > Thanks,
    > Tom
    >

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Mar 09 2000 - 03:16:37 EST